Hello it is Darrell here. This post is about the history of my claim with ACC & how complicated it is. It goes like this.
Assessed under FLP QUESTIONAIRE 69% Paid 1993-September 1994
Reassessed under FLP 100% September1994
Reassessed under FLP 100% September 1995
Reassessed FLP-AMA 9%
Decision issued July 5 1999
Review unsuccessful 12/10/1999
Appeal unsuccessful 2000
Reassessment in July 2000 AMA 7%
Decision issued 29/9/2000
Review decision quashed ACC DECISION NEW ASSESSMENT
Reassessment 8%
Decision issued 30/11/2001
Review quashes ACC DECISION & REVIEWER SUBSTITUTES HIS OWN DECISION FOR THAT OF ACC. Reinstatement of Independence allowance. Quashed 5/4/2002
ACC LODGE ON MAY 3 2002
ACC DECISION 23/8/2002 IS CORRECT IN LINE WITH REVIEW DECISION REINSTATING INDEPENDENCE ALLOWANCE
ACC SUCCESSFUL IN REVERSING REVIEW DECISION. BASED ON FALSE & MISLEADING EVIDENCE 8%
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO GO TO HIGH COURT WITH DRAWN.
LETTER FROM DOCTOR MORRIS ADMITTING THAT HE MISLED THE DISTRICT COURT & COMMITTED PERJURY.
REASSESSMENT DECISION 8%
REVIEW UNSUCCESSFUL
NO APPEAL
REASSESSMENT 8% BUT DECISION REVOKED BECAUSE DOCTOR WAS NOT REGISTERED.
REASSESSMENT 10%
